Skip to main content
English Cymraeg
Risk of campylobacteriosis from low-throughput poultry slaughterhouses

Risk of campylobacteriosis from low-throughput poultry slaughterhouses: Appendix

Appendix for the risk of campylobacteriosis from low-throughput poultry slaughterhouses report.

Last updated: 10 July 2023
See all updates
Last updated: 10 July 2023
See all updates

7.1 Sampling methods

Sampling results are provided in Annex I.

7.1.1 FSA survey

In order to answer the risk question, a survey of Campylobacter spp. in low-throughput poultry slaughterhouses that had not provided sampling results was set up. Sampling from the low-throughput slaughterhouses followed the Process Hygiene Criteria so as to match the sampling in high-throughput slaughterhouses. Sampling occurred weekly and was contracted out by FSA to Official Veterinarians and Campden BRI.

The samples were taken from the neck skin by the Official Veterinarian at the slaughterhouse after chilling of carcases. The samples were collected weekly for 10 weeks over September 2021 to December 2021 from 11 slaughterhouses. 

15 neck skin samples were pooled into 5 x 26g samples for Campylobacter testing. Two plants did not provide neck skin samples – V and W – due to the type of processing employed, namely, skinning in feather. The carcases were swabbed instead. 5 ceca samples were also collected weekly from all plants. Plant S only provided caeca samples. The samples were sent to Campden BRI for testing. In brief:

Neck skins from a minimum of 15 poultry carcases were sampled at random after chilling during each sampling session. Before examination, the neck skin samples from at least three poultry carcases from the same flock of origin were pooled into one sample of 26 g. 

Skinned in feather – not enough neck skin to sample, so swabbed instead

The samples were transported to the laboratory at a temperature not lower than 1 °C and not higher than 8 °C. The time between the sampling and testing for Campylobacter was less than 48 hours, in order to maintain sample integrity.

As laid out in the PHC, the 26 g test portion was transferred to nine volumes (234 ml) buffered peptone water at room temperature. The mixture was then treated in a stomacher or pulsifier for approximately one minute. Foaming was avoided by removing the air from the stomacher bag as much as possible. 10 ml (~ 1 g) of this initial suspension was then transferred to an empty sterile tube and 1 ml of the 10 ml was used for the enumeration of Campylobacter on selective plates. 

Participating plants: B, H, J, M, N, O, P, Q, R, S, V, W, AF  

7.1.2 FBO survey

FBOs are responsible for weekly testing and these need to follow the Process Hygiene Criteria. Results are reported to the FSA as: 

  • 100CFU/g or below
  • above 1000CFU/g
  • above 100CFU/g to 1000CFU/g
  • 1000CFU/g or below

Full enumeration levels are not provided.

7.2 Slaughterhouse throughput

Table 10: Slaughterhouse throughput, 2021.* plants for which no samples are available. 

Slaughterhouse Number Throughput
A* 140
B 14,810
C* 16,965
D* 19,414
E* 32,250
F* 53,920
G* 62,208
H 96,711
I* 104,065
J 114,903
K* 138,623
L* 147,310
M 149,828
N 169,652
O* 171,706
P* 213,330
Q 279,009
R 344,612
S 425,870
T* 477,900
U* 605,855
V 774,193
W 823,903
X* 826,289
Y 842,440
Z 919,112
AA 1,068,026
AB 1,659,473
AC 1,660,729
AD* 1,692,356
AE 1,725,677
AF 2,739,544
AG* 3,962,084
AH 6,006,776
AI* 6,045,432
AJ*

6,082,674

AK 6,207,361
AL 6,955,742
AM* 9,626,354
AN* 14,992,071
AO 16,531,082
AP 16,905,125
AQ 17,228,093
AR 17,772,740
AS 18,616,112
AT 21,337,212
AU 26,596,402
AV 31,008,386
AW 33,898,273
AX 37,793,556
AY 40,784,759
AZ 47,479,148
BA 47,742,107
BB 50,303,391
BC 50,780,751
BD 65,690,264
BE 93,045,048
BF 94,389,252
BG 103,360,123
BH 109,275,875

7.3 Estimate of contaminated poultry on market

Table 11: Estimate of highly contaminated poultry per year from high-throughput slaughterhouses, based on multiplying throughput data with the observed prevalence of high Campylobacter levels.

Slaughterhouse approval number  Proportion samples exceeding 1,000CFU/g Throughput per year Estimated highly contaminated poultry per year
AZ 0 47,479,148 0
BD 0.02857143 65,690,264 1,876,865
AT 0.03076923 21,337,212 656,530
AP 0.08 16,905,125 1,352,410
AQ 0.11235955 17,288,093 1,942,482
BF 0.17777778 94,389,252 16,780,312
AS 0.18181818 18,616,112 3,384,748
BC 0.18888889 50,780,751 9,591,920
AU 0.20689655 26,596,402 5,502,704
BA 0.21111111 47,742,107 10,078,889
AO 0.21538462 16,531,082 3,560,541
BE 0.22352941 93,045,048 20,798,305
BH 0.25690608 109,275,875 28,073,637
AX 0.26086957 37,793,556 9,859,189
AV 0.32 31,008,386 9,922,684
BB 0.46268657 50,303,391 23,274,703
AW 0.63291139 33,898,273 21,454,603
Total - 778,680,077 168,100,520

Table 12: Estimate of highly contaminated poultry per year from low-throughput slaughterhouses, based on multiplying throughput data with the observed prevalence of high Campylobacter levels.

Slaughterhouse approval number  Proportion samples exceeding 1000CFU/g Throughput per year Estimated highly contaminated poultry per year
AK 0.625 6,207,361 3,879,601
AL 0.4285 6,955,742 2,980,535
B 0.42 14,810 6,220
J 0.4035 114,903 46,363
Q 0.34 279,009 94,863
H 0.3279 96,711 31,712
V 0.3 774,193 232,258
Y 0.25 842,440 210,610
AH 0.2308 6,006,776 1,386,364
N 0.2 169,652 33,930
W 0.18 823,903 148,303
R 0.14 344,612 48,246
M 0.12 149,828 17,979
AF 0.1 2,739,544 273,954
AC 0 1,660,729 -
AA 0 1,068,026 -
S 0 425,870 -
Total - 28,674,109 9,390,938