Neidio i’r prif gynnwys
English Cymraeg
Prosiect ymchwil

Consumer Insights Tracker November 2023

The Consumer Insights Tracker is an online monthly tracking survey commissioned by the Food Standards Agency (FSA).

Diweddarwyd ddiwethaf: 12 December 2023
Diweddarwyd ddiwethaf: 12 December 2023

The Consumer Insights Tracker is an online monthly tracking survey commissioned by the Food Standards Agency (FSA). It monitors the behaviour and attitudes of adult consumers aged 16+ in England, Wales and Northern Ireland in relation to food.

The survey includes topics such as food availability, food affordability, consumer concerns in relation to food, confidence in the food supply chain and in the FSA as a regulator.

The full data set is published on data.food.gov.uk: Consumer Insights Tracker July 2023 - present.

Key findings for November 2023

  • Overall, measures related to food affordability, food availability and trust and confidence in the FSA have been stable over recent months.
  • Food prices remain the top concern for consumers, with around 9 in 10 saying they are concerned about this. Ultra-processed, or the over-processing of food, remains a concern for around three-quarters of respondents. This has remained stable since tracking began (75% in August 2023 to 76% in November 2023).  
  • Those worried about food affordability are more likely to report practicing certain ‘risky’ food behaviours to save money, such as reducing the length of time food is cooked for, turning off a fridge/freezer that contains food or eating food past the use-by date. Under 35s and those from the most deprived areas are also more likely to report practicing these kinds of ‘risky’ behaviours and are also generally more worried about food affordability. This pattern has been consistent since August 2023.  
  • There has been a small but significant increase in the proportion of respondents reporting confidence in the food supply chain (from 54% in October to 60% in November). More data is needed to confirm whether this is an upwards trend.   

Food affordability

Around one in four (26%) are worried about their household not being able to afford food in the next month.

This figure has been broadly stable between July and November.

Proportion who reported worrying about their household not being able to afford food in the next month  (footnote 1)

28% July 2023, 25% in August, 25% in September, 25% in October and 26% in November.

3% report that they, or someone in their household, received a free parcel of food from a food bank or other emergency food provider in the last month.

This figure is stable from August to November. 

Proportion who reported receiving a food parcel from a food bank or emergency food provider  (footnote 2)

2% August 2023, 3% in September, 2% October, 3% in November 2023.

74% report at least one of the following statements applies to them or their household in the last month.

This is comparable with the proportion reporting this in October (73%).

Reported shopping statements  (footnote 3)

Choosing cheaper alternatives 50% in November 2023 compared with 40% in October. Buying reduced discount foods 41% in November.

Reported cooking and eating statements

Cooking from scratch 38% in November and October and bulking meals out with cheaper ingredients 19% in November and 17% in October.

56% have used cheaper cooking methods instead of an oven to heat or cook food in the last month and 9% have eaten food cold because they couldn’t afford to cook it.

These figures are comparable with October.

Proportion who did any of the following to reduce energy bills or save money in the last month  (footnote 4)

Used cheaper cooking methods 56% in November and October and reducing cooking at 13% in November and October.

The following groups are significantly more likely to report practicing certain ‘risky’ food behaviours to save money:

  • Those worried about food affordability
  • Under 35s
  • Those from the most deprived areas

These differences have been consistent since August.

‘Risky’ food behaviours include reducing the length of time food is cooked for; lowering the cooking temperature for food; turning off a fridge/freezer containing food; changing fridge/freezer settings to a warmer temperature; or eating food past its use-by-date.  (footnote 5)

  • Those worried about food affordability are five times more likely than those not worried to report they have eaten food past its use-by-date to save money (25% v 5%).
  • Under 35s are twice as likely as those 55+ to report lowering the cooking temperature for food (18% vs. 9%), and three times as likely to report keeping their fridge/freezer at a warmer temperature to save money (16% vs. 5%).
  • Those in the most deprived IMD deciles are four times as likely to report turning off a fridge/freezer containing food (8% vs. 2%) than those in the least deprived.

Food availability

One in five (22%) are worried about there not being enough food available for their household in the next month.

This figure has been broadly stable between July and November.

Proportion who reported worrying about there not being enough food available for their household in the next month  (footnote 6)

24% in July, 22% August, 21% September, 21% October and 22% in November 2023.

Food concerns

89% are concerned about food prices, 76% are concerned about ultra-processed, or over-processing of food.

These figures are comparable with October.

Proportion who reported concern about food by topic  (footnote 7)

89% in November and October 2023, ultra-processed 76% in November and 74% in October.

Food supply chain

60% are confident in the food supply chain overall, a small but statistically significant increase compared to October.

Proportion who reported confidence in the food supply chain  (footnote 8)

 

55% in July 2023, 56% August, 56% September, 54% October and 60% in November 2023.

 

Proportion who reported confidence that those involved in the food supply chain ensure that...  (footnote 9)

 

Explained in the text.

The FSA

59% of those with some knowledge of the FSA trust the FSA to do its job.

Following a slight dip in September, trust in the FSA has returned to similar levels to August.

Proportion that trust the FSA to do its job  (footnote 10)

60% in August, 55% in September, 57% in October and 59% in November 2023.

Proportion who reported confidence that the FSA...  (footnote 11)

 

Explained in the text.

Background and methodological information

Changes in approach

Following a review of the FSA's Consumer Insights Tracker by the FSA’s Advisory Committee for Social Science (ACSS), the project was recommissioned in early 2023. 

In July 2023, the Consumer Insights Tracker was transitioned to a new supplier, YouGov. Changing supplier provided the opportunity to make the following methodological changes: 

  • review the questionnaire content and question wording
  • expand the sample to include adults aged 16+ (previously 16-75) 
  • boost the sample to include a larger number of participants from Northern Ireland
  • utilise a panel survey approach (previously an omnibus approach was used to collect the data)

Due to these methodological differences, data captured by YouGov (from July 2023 onwards) should not be directly compared to data captured by the previous supplier (April 2020 – June 2023). 

Method

  • this research was conducted online using the YouGov panel which gives access to 400,000 active panellists in the UK.
  • this report presents findings from November 2023. Where appropriate, comparisons are made to previous waves since July 2023.
  • 2,064 adults across England, Wales and Northern Ireland took part in the November survey between 2nd-6th November 2023. 
  • quotas were set by age, gender, education and region. The data is also weighted to be representative of the population by these demographic variables. All results are based on final weighted data.

Notes for interpretation

  • figures may not add up to 100% on graphs due to rounding, or in some questions, respondents were able to select multiple answers.  
  • significance testing is applied to the data to compare and determine whether a difference is “real”, or if it has occurred by chance (because not everyone in the population has been surveyed). 
  • any differences between demographic groups and month to month which are reported (with arrows) are statistically significant at the 95% confidence level.
  • if you require further information on the statistical significance testing carried out, please contact the social science team
  • where analysis is conducted by IMD, respondents are categorised within the country where they live, before a combined measure is created for the full sample.

For more information