Neidio i’r prif gynnwys
English Cymraeg
Evaluation of the implementation of prepacked for direct sale (PPDS) allergen labelling requirements

Methodology and sample profile - PPDS evaluation

This chapter presents the methodology used with each of the key stakeholder groups throughout the evaluation in more detail. It also covers the profile of consumers, Food Business Operators (FBOs) and Local Authorities (LAs) to understand more about who took part in the evaluation. 

Diweddarwyd ddiwethaf: 12 September 2023
Diweddarwyd ddiwethaf: 12 September 2023

 

Methodology overview

In order to develop a full picture of the awareness, understanding and impact of new PPDS labelling requirements, the research focused on three groups of stakeholders: 

  • Consumers in England, Northern Ireland and Wales who have at least one existing food hypersensitivity or a child with a food hypersensitivity
  • FBOs with up to 249 employees across the UK
  • LAs responsible for enforcing food safety regulations across the UK

A mixed-method approach to the research was adopted: 

  • Firstly, individuals from the three target groups were invited to complete surveys. Each group received a different survey that was specific to their engagement with PPDS labelling requirements. 
  • Secondly, some of those who took part in the surveys were then invited to take part in an in-depth interview to expand upon the information they gave in the survey. Again, there were three different topic guides used to structure interviews, which were designed to capture the nuances of each group’s experience. 

The details of engagement with each group are shown in Table 3.1.

Table 3.1 Summary of methodology and completed interviews

Method Overview
Online survey with consumers
  • An online survey of 1,809 consumers with food hypersensitivities and parents of children with food hypersensitivities across England, Wales and Northern Ireland.
  • A mixture of methods was used to recruit eligible consumers, including: a consumer panel, promotion by patient organisations and promotion on the FSA’s social media platforms.
Qualitative interviews with consumers
  • A total of 31 interviews with FHS consumers with food hypersensitivities in the England, Wales and Northern Ireland.
  • Contact details (and consent for recontact) were acquired from the survey with this audience. 
Telephone survey of Food Business Operators (FBOs)
  • Telephone surveys of 900 FBOs in the UK
  • The survey covered all 4 nations (612 England, 52 Northern Ireland, 161 Scotland, 75 Wales,).
  • Contact details were obtained from a commercial provider, Market Location. 
Online survey with LAs
  • Attempted census with all Local Authorities in the UK
  • A total of 126 online responses.
  • Invited to complete the survey by the FSA or FSS.
Qualitative interviews with FBOs, Market Traders and LAs
  • 19 interviews with FBOs, including 5 interviews with market traders.
  • 21 interviews with representatives from Local Authorities in the UK.
  • Contact details (and consent for recontact) were acquired from the surveys with these audiences.
  • Where possible, FBOs and market traders were paired with their Local Authority to form case studies. Eight case studies were completed in total.

Consumers

Methodology

A total of 1,809 consumers with food hypersensitivities, or with a child with a food hypersensitivity, residing in England, Wales and Northern Ireland completed the online survey between 29 November 2022 and 13 January 2023. Consumers were approached through a range of sources:

  • An external panel provider, which recruited 400 consumers who completed the survey.
  • Three food hypersensitivity charities (Coeliac UK, Allergy UK and The Natasha Allergy Research Foundation), who shared an open link to the survey on social media and their newsletters.
  • The FSA, who shared an open link to the survey on their social media towards the end of fieldwork with a specific aim to boost response rates in Wales and Northern Ireland.

The survey was approximately 15 minutes long and encompassed a number of topic areas: the nature of consumers’ food hypersensitivity; their use and confidence in food labels (both generally and specifically regarding PPDS foods); their awareness of new labelling requirements; their experience of buying PPDS foods since the introduction of the legislation; and the impact it has had for them. In the cases where the consumer had a child with a food hypersensitivity, the same topic areas were covered but framed in regards to their experience of purchasing PPDS foods for their child. 

Consumers who completed the survey via an open link from a charity and the FSA indicated at the end of the survey whether they would be happy to be recontacted for a follow-up interview. A total of 659 consumers agreed to be recontacted, representing 53% of those asked.

A total of 31 consumers took part in a follow-up in-depth telephone interview, which explored their experiences in more detail. Broad targets were set to ensure the perspectives of a variety of consumers were captured; by country, severity of allergy, whether or not they had coeliac disease and whether they had a food hypersensitivity or their child did. In addition, a spread of awareness of legislation, PPDS purchasing behaviour and potential impact of the legislation were targeted. These interviews took place between 19 December 2022 and 11 January 2023, and lasted 45-60 minutes. 

Sample profile

The FSA were keen to understand the perspective of consumers with their own hypersensitivity, and the experiences of those who have a child with a food hypersensitivity. Almost three quarters (74%) of consumers who completed the survey indicated they had a food hypersensitivity and around one in ten (11%) of all respondents stated that their child had a food hypersensitivity. A further 15% indicated that both they and their child had food hypersensitivities; this latter group responded to the survey regarding their own experience, rather than that of their child. 

The severity of food hypersensitivity varied; over half of consumers (56%) stated that their food hypersensitivity was severe. Around a third (34%) indicated theirs was moderate and 8% felt theirs was mild. This rating related to the allergy or intolerance they felt to be the most severe if they had multiple allergies. Two in five (42%) consumers in the survey reported having multiple allergies. 

Overall, three-quarters (73%) of consumers had an allergy or intolerance to a regulated allergen only, with a further 19% having an allergy or intolerance to both a regulated and non-regulated allergen. The food which consumers had an allergy or intolerance to varied, with the most common being cereals containing gluten (65%). Almost half (46%) of surveys completed were obtained from Coeliac UK, which is likely to contribute to this prevalence. Of consumers who stated they had a food hypersensitivity to cereals containing gluten, 83% had Coeliac disease. 78% of those who had Coeliac disease said this was medically diagnosed. Taking this as a proportion of all consumers who took part, around half (53%) had Coeliac disease. Only around 1% of the population in the UK have Coeliac disease. (footnote 1)  To help understand the impact of this on the findings, we have highlighted differences between those with and without Coeliac disease throughout the report.

Those who had a food hypersensitivity to cereals containing gluten, but were not diagnosed with Coeliac disease, more often referred to this as a food intolerance (72%) rather than an allergy (22%). Other food types with prevalent allergies and intolerances included milk and dairy (24%), peanuts (14%), other nuts (13%) and vegetables (11%). This is further detailed in Figure 3.2, which also shows whether this was classified by consumers as an allergy or intolerance. Food marked with an ‘*’ indicates a regulated allergen.  

Figure 3.2  Food hypersensitivity and whether it is categorised as an allergy or intolerance (footnote 2) 

On the left: bar chart showing types of food hypersensitivity. On the right: stacked bar chart showing percentages of respondents with an allergy or intolerance to each food.

A2. Do you / your child experience a bad or unpleasant reaction to any of the following foods? Base: All consumers (1,809). A4. How would you best describe your problem with this food? Base: All consumers who have a food sensitivity to each of the food types (milk and dairy (424), peanuts (253), other nuts (227), vegetables (104), fruit (144), eggs (163), soya (122), crustaceans (120), molluscs (99), other cereals (94), sesame (74), fish (66)).

Consumers were more likely to be intolerant, rather than allergic, to certain food types - particularly to milk and dairy (70% intolerance vs 26% allergy), vegetables (63% intolerance vs 29% allergy) and soya (58% intolerance vs 33% allergy). Conversely, consumers were more likely to report having an allergy, rather than an intolerance, to peanuts (81% allergy vs 14% intolerance), other nuts (81% allergy vs 14% intolerance) and sesame (74% allergy vs 19% intolerance).  

In terms of demographics, the majority of consumers identified as female (79% vs 20% male) and White (95%). (footnote 3) The age of consumers varied; 14% were aged between 18 and 34 years old, 60% between 35 and 64 and 23% were 65 or older. The majority of consumers (85%) were in England, 9% in Wales and 6% Northern Ireland. (footnote 4)  

When responding on behalf of their child with a food hypersensitivity, around half (47%) stated that their child was female, and a similar proportion (52%) had a male child with a food hypersensitivity . The age of the child varied, with 29% between 0 and 6 years old, 26% between 7 and 10 years old and 43% between 11 and 17 years old. 

Qualitative interviews

A total of 31 in-depth interviews were achieved with a subset of the consumers who completed the survey. Interviews were conducted with a variety of consumers, targeted to ensure a range of people by country, whether they or their child had a food hypersensitivity, the nature and type of food hypersensitivity and experiences since the new legislation. Tables 3.2 to 3.10 show the number of consumers who took part in the qualitative interviews by subgroup. 

Table 3.2 Qualitative interviews by country

Country Number of achieved qualitative interviews
England  25
Northern Ireland 3
Wales 3
Total 31

Table 3.3 Qualitative interviews by respondent or child's food hypersensitivity

Respondent or child’s food hypersensitivity Number of achieved qualitative interviews
Respondent has food hypersensitivity 24
Child has food hypersensitivity 7
Total 31

Table 3.4  Qualitative interviews by severity of food hypersensitivity

Severity of food hypersensitivity Number of achieved qualitative interviews
Mild 3
Moderate 5
Severe 21
Don't know 2
Total 31

Table 3.5 Qualitative interviews by coeliac disease status

Coeliac disease status Number of achieved qualitative interviews
Coeliac disease 16
Not Coeliac disease 15
Total  31

Table 3.6 Qualitative interviews by awareness of PPDS labelling requirements

Awareness of PPDS labelling requirements Number of achieved qualitative interviews
Aware of PPDS labelling requirements before survey 28
Unaware of PPDS labelling requirements before survey 3
Total 31

Table 3.7 Qualitative interviews by change in experience of buying PPDS foods since October 2021

Change in experience of buying PPDS foods since October 2021 Number of achieved qualitative interviews
Experience of buying PPDS has improved since Oct 21 12
Experience of buying PPDS has worsened since Oct 21 2
Total 14

Table 3.8 Qualitative interviews by change in quality of life since October 2021

Change in quality of life since October 2021 Number of achieved qualitative interviews
Quality of life has improved since Oct 21 11
Quality of life has worsened since Oct 21 4
Total 15

Table 3.9 Qualitative interviews by change in amount of PPDS food purchases since October 2021

Change in amount of PPDS food purchases since October 2021 Number of achieved qualitative interviews
Buys PPDS foods more since Oct 21 9
Buys PPDS foods less since Oct 21 9
Total 18

Table 3.10 Qualitative interviews by change in confidence in buying PPDS foods since October 2021

Change in confidence in buying PPDS foods since October 2021 Number of achieved qualitative interviews
Confidence in PPDS labelling increased since Oct 21 12
Confidence in PPDS labelling not increased since Oct 21 7
Total 19

Food Business Operators

Methodology

A total of 900 food business operators (FBOs) in the UK completed the telephone survey between 25 November 2022 and 12 January 2023. The sample was obtained through an external provider (Market Location) and during fieldwork, interviews were monitored by business size, sector and country to ensure the sample size for each group was sufficient and a representative sample was achieved. (footnote 5) 

The survey took an average of 19 minutes to complete and were conducted with the person with responsibility for food safety at the FBO. The survey covered awareness and understanding of PPDS, current PPDS practices, support with and effects of PPDS legislation, as well as key firmographics about the business.

During analysis, the data was weighted to match the profile of the population by sector, size and country. (footnote 6) 

At the end of the survey, 449 FBOs agreed that they were happy to take part in a follow-up qualitative interview, representing 50% of the sample. As with the consumer interviews, targets were set in order to achieve a broad range of perspectives, in this case, these were centred around country, size and sector, as well as awareness of, compliance with PPDS legislation and perceived ease of this. A total of 19 FBOs took part in in-depth interviews between 17 December 2022 and 3 February 2023. These were completed over the phone or via Zoom or Microsoft Teams. Interviews took between 45 and 60 minutes.

In order to account for those who sell PPDS foods from a market stall, five businesses that sold PPDS food from a moveable or temporary premises (e.g. a market stall or mobile sales vehicle) also took part in a qualitative interview. Once they had agreed to participate, market traders took part in an interview over the phone or via Zoom or Microsoft Teams. These interviews took place between 16 January and 1 February 2023 and took between 45 and 60 minutes.

Profile of FBOs

FBOs that are restaurants or cafes makes up the largest proportion (49%) of businesses that took part in the survey, followed by general retail (28%) and catering (15%). Half (50%) were the smallest business size with between 1 and 5 employees, and the majority (84%) were situated in England. A full breakdown of interviews achieved by country, size and sector is shown in Tables 3.11 to 3.14.

The proportion of surveyed businesses in each size and sector also represent the relevant proportions within each of the nations. 

The majority (91%) of businesses sold PPDS foods at the time they participated in the survey. The remaining 9% had sold PPDS foods in the previous 12 months but had stopped doing so at the time of the survey. (footnote 7)  

Table 3.11 Breakdown of businesses by country

Country Number of achieved mainstage surveys
England 612
Northern Ireland  52
Scotland 161
Wales 75
Total 900


Table 3.12 Breakdown of businesses by number of employees

Number of employees Number of achieved mainstage surveys
Between 1 and 5 employees 347
Between 6 and 10 employees 266
11 or more employees 287
Total 900

Table 3.13 Breakdown of businesses by sector group

Sector group Number of achieved mainstage surveys
Catering 355
Retail 545
Total 900

Table 3.14 Breakdown of businesses by sector (detailed)

Sector detailed Number of achieved mainstage surveys
Caterers 107
Restaurants and cafes 248
Bakers 136
Butchers 133
Delicatessens 79
General retail 197
Total 900

Qualitative interviews

In terms of the qualitative interviews, 19 FBOs including five businesses that sold PPDS food from a moveable or temporary premises (e.g. a market stall or mobile sales vehicle) who completed a qualitative interview. The profile is shown in Tables 3.15 to 3.18. 

Table 3.15 Breakdown of FBO qualitative interviews by country

Country Number of achieved mainstage surveys
England 12
Northern Ireland 2
Scotland 4
Wales 1
Total 19

Table 3.16 Breakdown of FBO qualitative interviews by number of employees

Number of employees Number of achieved mainstage surveys
Between 1 and 5 employees 8
Between 6 and 10 employees 5
11 or more employees 6
Total 19

Table 3.17 Breakdown of FBO qualitative interviews by sector group

Sector group Number of achieved mainstage surveys
Catering 9
Retail 10
Total 19

Table 3.18 Breakdown of FBO qualitative interviews by sector (detailed)

Sector detailed Number of achieved mainstage surveys
Caterers 5
Restaurants and cafes 4
Bakers 5
Butchers 2
Delicatessen 2
General retail 1
Total 19

Local Authorities

Methodology

A total of 126 staff members, covering 124, of the 398 Local Authorities (LAs) across the UK, completed the online survey between 1 December 2022 and 13 January 2023. (footnote 8) The FSA and FSS distributed the link to the online survey by email and followed up to encourage LAs to complete the survey if they had not done so already. Upon invitation to take part in the survey, the email asked that the person best placed within the local authority to provide feedback on the experience of the PPDS labelling requirements takes part. This may be their lead food officer or someone they nominate to take part. (footnote 9) The survey covered their understanding of PPDS, how PPDS checks are carried out, experience of these checks and enforcement and impact on LAs and FBOs in their area.

A total of 39 LAs agreed to be recontacted in the survey, of these, 21 took part in an interview over the phone or via Zoom or Microsoft Teams between 14 December 2022 and 26 January 2023. These interviews lasted between 45 and 60 minutes on average.

Profile of LAs

In line with the UK profile of LAs, the majority of who completed the survey were in England. A full breakdown by country is shown in Table 3.19. 

Table 3.19 Profile of LAs who took part in survey by country

Country Number of achieved mainstage surveys Total number of LAs in each country
England 82 333
Northern Ireland 11 11
Scotland 19 32
Wales 12 22
Total 124 398

Staff members who completed the survey indicated the area of the LA that they worked in, most worked in food standards or safety (80%), others worked in environmental health (28%) and trading standards (16%). (footnote 10)  

Qualitative interviews

The profile of LAs who took part in the qualitative interviews by country, ease of checking compliance and overall description of the level of compliance of FBOs in their area with PPDS labelling requirements is shown in Tables 3.20 to 3.23.

Table 3.20 Profile of LAs who took part in qualitative interviews by country

Country Number of achieved qualitative interviews
England 12
Northern Ireland 1
Scotland 7
Wales 1
Total  21

Table 3.21 Profile of LAs who took part in qualitative interviews by experience of compliance checks

Experience of compliance checks Number of achieved qualitative interviews
Found compliance checks easy 11
Found compliance checks difficult 10
Total 21

Table 3.22 Profile of LAs who took part in qualitative interviews by perceived level of compliance in area

Perceived level of compliance in area Number of achieved qualitative interviews
Overall level of compliance good 9
Overall level of compliance poor 10
Total 21

Table 3.23 Profile of LAs who took part in qualitative interviews by perceived experience of Food Business Operators

Perceived experience of FBOs Number of achieved qualitative interviews
FBO experience of compliance considered easy 1
FBO experience of compliance considered difficult 20
Total 21