Does proactively asking about allergens before ordering by Food Business Operator staff improve customer outcomes?
Appendix 1: Interaction Models and ITT Model Outputs
This sections covers the interaction models and ITT model outputs for proactively asking about allergens behavioural trial report.
Table 7: Model outputs, interaction models
![Predictors are shown in the first column. Perceptions of food safety is a common header for the second to the fourth columns. Estimates, confidence interval and p-value for perception are shown in the second, third and fourth column respectively. Confidence in identifying ingredients is a common header for the fifth to the seventh columns. Estimates, confidence interval and p-value for confidence are shown in the fifth, sixth and seventh column respectively. Comfort asking staff about ingredients is a commo](/sites/default/files/media/image/Table%207.1.png)
![Predictors are shown in the first column. Perceptions of food safety is a common header for the second to the fourth columns. Estimates, confidence interval and p-value for perception are shown in the second, third and fourth column respectively. Confidence in identifying ingredients is a common header for the fifth to the seventh columns. Estimates, confidence interval and p-value for confidence are shown in the fifth, sixth and seventh column respectively. Comfort asking staff about ingredients is a commo](/sites/default/files/media/image/Table%207.2.png)
Table 8: Model outputs, intent-to-treat models (primary outcomes)
![Predictors are shown in the first column. Perceptions of food safety is a common header for the second to the fourth columns. Estimates, confidence interval and p-value for perception are shown in the second, third and fourth column respectively. Confidence in identifying ingredients is a common header for the fifth to the seventh columns. Estimates, confidence interval and p-value for confidence are shown in the fifth, sixth and seventh column respectively. Comfort asking staff about ingredients is a commo](/sites/default/files/media/image/Table%208.png)
Table 9: Model outputs, intent-to-treat models (secondary outcomes)
![Satisfaction with overall experience is a common header for the second to the fourth columns. Estimates, confidence interval and p-value for satisfaction are shown in the second, third and fourth column respectively. Trust in FBO is a common header for the fifth to the seventh columns. Estimates, confidence interval and p-value for trust are shown in the fifth, sixth and seventh column respectively. Likelihood to recommend FBO is a common header for the eighth to the tenth columns. Estimates, confidence int](/sites/default/files/media/image/Table%209.1.png)
![Satisfaction with overall experience is a common header for the second to the fourth columns. Estimates, confidence interval and p-value for satisfaction are shown in the second, third and fourth column respectively. Trust in FBO is a common header for the fifth to the seventh columns. Estimates, confidence interval and p-value for trust are shown in the fifth, sixth and seventh column respectively. Likelihood to recommend FBO is a common header for the eighth to the tenth columns. Estimates, confidence int](/sites/default/files/media/image/Table%209.2.png)
Table 10: Model outputs, interaction models II - Declaration of allergy or intolerance
![Predictors are shown in the first column. Odds ratios are shown in the second column. Confidence intervals are shown in the third column and p-values are shown in the fourth column.](/sites/default/files/media/image/Table%2010.png)
Predictors | Odds Ration | CI | p |
---|---|---|---|
Intercept | 0.01 | 0.00 to 0.04 | <0.001 |
Treatment (Treatment) | 9.02 | 3.52 - 26.39 | <0.001 |
Hypersensitivity (Yes) | 9.83 | 3.20 - 31.98 | <0.001 |
Age (26 to 35) | 0.67 | 0.27 - 1.60 | 0.378 |
Age (36 to 49) | 1.09 | 0.39 - 2.81 | 0.862 |
Age (50+) | 3.28 | 0.95 - 10.45 | 0.049 |
Gender (Female) | 1.42 | 0.70 - 3.01 | 0.341 |
Treatment Hypersensitivity | 0.89 | 0.20 - 3.92 | 0.880 |
Observations: 508
R Tiur 0.231
* This model was conducted using a model without a random intercept, which had a better fit (AIC = 248.200, vs 250.207)
Table 11 Model outputs, intent-to-treat models (secondary outcomes II)
![Predictors are shown in the first column. Odds ratios, confidence intervals and p-values for declaration of allergy or intolerance are shown in the second, third and fourth column respectively. Odds ratios, confidence intervals and p-values for declaration of allergy or intolerance with treatment*hypersensitivity as an additional predictor are shown in the fifth, sixth and seventh column respectively. The number of observations is shown on the eleventh row, and the R-squared statistic on the twelfth row.](/sites/default/files/media/image/Table%2011.png)
Hanes diwygio
Published: 20 Ebrill 2023
Diweddarwyd ddiwethaf: 22 Ebrill 2024
Hanes diwygio
Published: 20 Ebrill 2023
Diweddarwyd ddiwethaf: 22 Ebrill 2024