Mansfield
Monday 19 May 2003
10-12 December 2002
The Service was proactively working with local groups and businesses to promote food safety and had organised its resources to provide an effective Food Service. Inspections of food premises were on target and both food sampling and the response to Food Hazard Warnings were being carried out in a co-ordinated way.
Further work is required to ensure that the necessary procedures are in place to ensure consistency across all areas of the Standard. Of particular concern is the immediate need to review the authorisation of the Service’s officers and the measures by which it monitors activities and records actions taken.
Strengths
Food Safety Promotion - There was clear evidence of a proactive approach to promote food safety issues amongst targeted vulnerable groups involving the community and engaging multi-agency working.
Database - The database used by the Service was comprehensive and was being used effectively as an integral part of the food enforcement service. Detailed information obtained during the course of the Service’s enforcement actions was entered in the database and was readily available to officers carrying out subsequent action and was used as a means of monitoring the effectiveness of the Service. There was evidence that a lot of time and resources had been invested in the system and it formed a sound foundation for the Service’s activities.
Co-ordination of Sampling - The Service was operating an effective sampling regime which was well organised and monitored and which targeted resources efficiently.
Key areas for improvement
Authorisation of Officers The Authority needs to urgently review its authorisations of officers to ensure that they are correctly authorised to carry out the full range of food law enforcement activities.
Improvement Notices - There were significant deficiencies in the drafting, service and enforcement of improvement notices. Formal enforcement actions must be carried out in accordance with relevant legislation and Food Safety Act Codes of Practice.
Records - Records of inspections, investigations and other actions across many areas of the Standard were insufficient. Records are important to provide information for subsequent inspections, to enable appropriate enforcement decisions to be taken and to allow effective internal monitoring to be undertaken.
